innervisionow.net

This next post is an expanded and modified version of two emails I sent to the owner of the following http://www.data4science.net/ Concerning NASA, I can recall writing to them and asking them why they still promote the woefully obsolete rocket technology as “state of the art”. Of course I know the answer, it’s for public consumption, which doesn’t say a lot about public curiousity. I reminded them of the Biefield-Brown effect which has been known about since at least the 40’s, and asked them to visit sites such as JLN Labs (granted, there’s no guarantee Mssr. Naudin is an expert in any of this, but then he doesn’t pretend to be either). There is an abundance of antigravity research being conducted by inventors that makes NASA’s “state of the art” rockets look silly. They never did answer any emails, even when I sent the most basic of questions. Perhaps if they were serious they could attract some competent and open minded scientists. Anyone with a fair amount of intelligence and observational/critical thinking ability must notice this about the extremely obsolete rocket technology. I noted and wrote two years ago that projectile weapons are obsolete (yes, they ‘do the job’, but in a situation in which you can render an entire Army, Navy, AF and Marines unconscious or dead with a flash, their projectile weapons are useless. But then, I don’t think that’s their purpose or “mission” I understand why Major General two times Medal of Honor recipient Smedley Butler has been deleted from history teachings in the schools and on television as his message was true, and coming from him, devastating to these tyrants which represents the ‘defense’ industry. Most people believe that projectile weapons are state of the art, and have only seen the release of ‘new’ energy weapons technology. In truth, the energy weapon technology is far more advanced than they want people to believe, and make projectile weaponry nearly obsolete. I know a great deal of money is spent in purchasing and creating projectile weapons, and these are now ‘enhanced’ with DU (the gift that keeps on ‘giving’). Money has been directed at NASAs budget for disinfo, ‘assisting’ people believe that rocket technology is ’state of the art’ which is untrue (and has been untrue for a long time).. PTJ’s (from the aforementioned site) are very interesting. I sincerely wish that enough information could be compiled about this to compile into a book–there must be others with the same curiosity. The planet is “dying”. In addition, enormous changes are occurring throughout the entire solar system, and the answers to these changes are not to be found in orthodox science, but in geometric shapes (our “reality” is based on “sacred” geometry, but in truth this is the basis for “hyperdimensional physics”. There is some useful information on this done by the reincarnated famous sleeping psychic and channeler of a being with a two0letter name (extreme discernment here, please, hang onto your wallets/purses/bank accounts with people like this self-promotional young man (brilliant as he is, mixing empirical research with channeled messages and using your incarnational ’status’ (hey, we all have had very interesting incarnations), but the ‘expert’ that uses density and dimension interchangeably and is clueless of the purpose of barriers from 3rd density to 4th and 5th stating that spacecraft are used to traverse the barriers is ad-libbing it as he goes along. Mix and match gurus require serious discernment. Consciousness (intelligence/wisdom) does not start from “nothing”. I do not, nor never will declare myself to be “right” on everything as I am a student here as we all are (the very reason I emphasize NOT “taking my work” for ANYTHING, as it is ALL external information to the reader, but consider it merely food for thought. I analyze, set aside what does not seem to work but never discard thoughts and ideas–and understand thoroughly that external analysis will not ever reveal truth simply because of the illusionary basis of external “reality”. What is “science”, and what is “magic”? Reductionist “science” is a view of the small picture, and having stepped back as far as possible using a “big picture” mindset we still have very few answers. So we then do the last option, which is looking within–and there you find a picture both complex and simple (depending on which side of the “looking glass” you’re standing at! From “here”, we have no hope of understanding the “big picture”, but the point is in learning by observing. From “there”, “here” is so simple it is amusing. Having been born with an insatiable curiousity and a notorious disdain for authority as truth instead of the reverse, I am quite sad at the state that I see the Earth in, but understand it’s part of a natural process. If technology like Raymond Rife, or a number of other promising researcher’s work had become the medical standard, or if Maxwell’s quaternions had been preserved and Tesla’s technology (among others) had been allowed to flourish we would see a very different planet–BUT the planet is dying and graduating, as all of us do–and is in a pristine state above 3rd density. I grieve as I do for all those I love because of the loss, but at the same time I understand this natural step toward advancement we all take as part of the journey. My understanding of technology and it’s capacity to restrict spiritual growth is written on other blogs–it can be compared to any other form of material wealth–and I understand that our true growth comes from both sorrow and joy, part of the Balance. ..http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_techfor21century.htm ,do a search on the mathemetician Maxwell, Royal Raymond Rife (there is a very interesting machine based on Rife’s technology sold by a company called New Earth–it can be found on Rense’s website, and is for experimental purposes only–, not to mention Moray, Bedini, and what about Edward Leedskalnin of Coral Castle fame, John Hutchison http://www.hutchisoneffect.ca/ , the testastika in Switzerland, Stanley Meyer’s HHO (brown’s gas) experiments which caused sudden death but have been replicated time and again. Eugene Mallove’s accidental on purpose gangster ‘hit’ cold fusion which has been demonstrated, explained and literally taught the entire process including materials and procedure at JLN Labs by Mssr. Naudin, a very experienced inventor? what of the site at http://www.americanantigravity.com/? (overunity energy and electrogravitics tech often have the same source), and last, but not least, how much did you read about Tesla (the man who brought us AC electric power, radio, and much more) in school? How about on television, the “history” (in quotes for good reason as our so called “history” is “contrived/altered/false” to say the least. –and these are but a few!). Pseudo-skepticism, which is a belief system (the belief of non-belief, which admittedly I was) is an enormous obstacle to learning, as dogmatic as any oppressive religious belief system. Pseudo-skeptics such as the illustrious well-qualified scientist/researcher James Randi do their research from an armchair, and spend no time in actual hard research (”soft”, come to think of it!), and is a pitfall of scientism, as is the “herd mentality”. There are most definitely some people making claims without any empirical evidence, the best of which mix truth in with disinfo and never actually prove anything. This is the same as debunking by proclamation, only with more effort involved. Please, Mr. Randi, debate some of the lightweights and really SHOW them foolish, uneducated academically honest scientists like Retire Stanford University Material Science/Physics professor Dr. William Tiller or that know nothing Nobel Prize-winning Cambridge Professor Dr. Brian Josephson, though I could create a long list of physicists, neurophysiologists, and some rascally biologists such as Rupert Sheldrake for whom independent researchers have proven canine telepathy exists (must be a lying vermint, that Rupert, (prolly snuck in and tampered with the make-believe research and statistics partially done by a known close-minded skeptical animal scientist to his surprise) or the disreputable and evil Dr.s David Bohm (that furener-liar Dr. ‘Al’ Einstein’s protege) or Dr. Alain Aspect (can’t trust them thar Frenchie physicists or that scalawag mathemetician John Bell) with that non-locality experiment in the 80s (prolly got together with that no good neurophysiologist Karl Pribram, anuther furener.

But, despite the reductionist clowns that do their best to keep you in your 19th century scientism paradigm “box”, it is your choice to see beyond it, and the knowledge and vision is there for the asking. These reductionists such as those at CSICOP do not perform any research, nor do they bother even looking. What is “real” and what is “illusion”. We attempt to classify reality on our terms, even if it’s Bohm’s implicate/explicate holographic theory, or torsion waves–or is it the hermetic, gnostic, shamanic view? etc. etc. In the end, it is up to each of us to see for ourselves, and that we do by exploring outside and in. It’s our choice to look or not. Fantastic view if you choose to….